Active and passive seismic monitoring of laboratory-based injection-driven fault reactivation

Conference Paper (2023)
Authors

A.V. Veltmeijer (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

M. Naderloo (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

A. Barnhoorn (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
Copyright
© 2023 A.V. Veltmeijer, M. Naderloo, A. Barnhoorn
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202310513
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 A.V. Veltmeijer, M. Naderloo, A. Barnhoorn
Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202310513
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Robust and reliable prediction of (induced) earthquakes remains a challenging task. Seismicity predictions are made using probabilistic models, precursors such as average earthquake size distribution. Pore pressure variations cause stress perturbations along pre-existing fault planes in the subsurface, resulting in shear slip and seismicity. Monitoring these stress changes before fault reactivation and its resulting seismicity could greatly improve forecasting seismicity. Stress changes can be determined by changes in acoustic or seismic velocities. Therefore, experiments are performed to detect the preparatory phase of an earthquake using acoustic monitoring. Faulted sandstone samples are reactivated in the laboratory by imposing pore pressure changes by fluid injection under reservoir pressures, while continuously performing passive and active (transmission) acoustics measurements. Using coda wave interferometry (CWI) and decorrelation (K), changes in velocity and scattering are obtained before and during fault reactivation. We show that fault reactivation can be identified by a large velocity drop and an increase in K or by micro-seismic foreshocks. We show that CWI velocity change is most sensitive to both the preparatory phase and the fault reactivation. These results show acoustic monitoring of fault reactivation in the laboratory is feasible, which could improve the prediction of induced seismicity.

Files

513.pdf
(pdf | 0.822 Mb)
License info not available