A Matter of Debris Composition

Analyzing Debris Accumulations at Bridges After the 2021 Flood

Conference Paper (2025)
Author(s)

Lisa Burghardt (RWTH Aachen University)

Daan W. Poppema (TU Delft - Coastal Engineering)

Davide Wuthrich (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Sebastien Erpicum (Université de Liège)

Elena Maria Klopries (RWTH Aachen University)

Benjamin Dewals (Université de Liège)

Research Group
Coastal Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.64697/978-90-835589-7-4_41WC-P1791-cd
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Coastal Engineering
Pages (from-to)
1043-1048
Publisher
IAHR
ISBN (print)
9789083558974
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of debris accumulations at bridges and flume experiments, based on field data collected after the extreme flood event which hit Belgium and Germany in 2021. Post-flood photos were analyzed regarding bridge designs, debris accumulation volumes and debris compositions as well as flooding conditions. This showed that the voluminous debris accumulations contained a large share of anthropogenic materials characterized by various shapes. Based on averaged bridge data, prototype bridges were chosen for the experimental modelling, which was conducted in three laboratories in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Thanks to this multi-lab approach, over 250 experiments were conducted, determining the effect of upstream hydraulic conditions, debris shape and bridge design on backwater rise. Compared to debris accumulations with only logs, backwater rise increased with larger shares of plates in the debris compositions, while decreasing with the same shares of cuboid elements. The number of piers and the geometry of the bridge deck showed a strong effect on the clogging behavior, and a closed handrail led to higher backwater rise compared to a porous or no handrail. As a result of various test set-ups and continuous comparisons, inter-lab differences could be determined and reduced, and therefore resulting in a more reliable dataset. On this basis, recommendations for future bridge design and operational flood protection measures were derived.

Files

Burghardt_et_al_-_2025_IAHR_-_... (pdf)
(pdf | 0.396 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 27-12-2025
Taverne