Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments
a survey among EAES surgeons
S. F. Hardon (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology, Amsterdam UMC)
Masie Rahimi (Amsterdam UMC)
R.R. Postema (Amsterdam UMC, TU Delft - Team Sergio Grammatico)
E. Willuth (Heidelberg University Hospital)
Y. Mintz (Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES))
Alberto Arezzo (European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), University of Turin)
J. Dankelman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
F. Nickel (Heidelberg University Hospital, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES))
T. Horeman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
J.A. Sanchez Margallo (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
More Authors (External organisation)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.