Multi-level driver workload prediction using machine learning and off-the-shelf sensors

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Paul van Gent (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Timo Melman (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Haneen Farah (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Nicole van Nes (Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV))

B van Van Arem (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Transport and Planning
Copyright
© 2018 P. van Gent, T. Melman, H. Farah, Nicole van Nes, B. van Arem
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118790372
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 P. van Gent, T. Melman, H. Farah, Nicole van Nes, B. van Arem
Transport and Planning
Issue number
37
Volume number
2672
Pages (from-to)
141-152
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The present study aims to add to the literature on driver workload prediction using machine learning methods. The main aim is to develop workload prediction on a multi-level basis, rather than a binary high/low distinction as often found in literature. The presented approach relies on measures that can be obtained unobtrusively in the driving environment with off-the-shelf sensors, and on machine learning methods that can be implemented in low-power embedded systems. Two simulator studies were performed, one inducing workload using realistic driving conditions, and one inducing workload with a relatively demanding lane-keeping task. Individual and group-based machine learning models were trained on both datasets and evaluated. For the group-based models the generalizing capability, that is the performance when predicting data from previously unseen individuals, was also assessed. Results show that multi-level workload prediction on the individual and group level works well, achieving high correct rates and accuracy scores. Generalizing between individuals proved difficult using realistic driving conditions but worked well in the highly demanding lane-keeping task. Reasons for this discrepancy are discussed as well as future research directions.