On pressure modes in ice-induced vibrations using multivariate analysis

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Ersegun Deniz Gedikli (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

Torodd S. Nord (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

H. Hendrikse (TU Delft - Offshore Engineering)

Gesa Ziemer (HSVA)

Research Group
Offshore Engineering
Copyright
© 2019 Ersegun Deniz Gedikli, Torodd Skjerve Nord, H. Hendrikse, Gesa Ziemer
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.02.003
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Ersegun Deniz Gedikli, Torodd Skjerve Nord, H. Hendrikse, Gesa Ziemer
Research Group
Offshore Engineering
Volume number
160
Pages (from-to)
150-162
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Pressures at the ice-structure interface during model-scale ice-structure interaction are often measured with tactile sensors. Resulting datasets usually include large volume of data along with some measurement error and noise; therefore, it is inherently hard to extract the hidden fluctuating pressures in the system. Identifying the deterministic pressure fluctuation in ice-induced vibrations is essential to understand this complex phenomenon better. In this paper, we discuss the use of two different multivariate analysis techniques to decompose an ensemble of measured pressure data into spatiotemporal modes that gives insights into pressure distributions in ice-induced vibrations. In particular, we use proper-orthogonal decomposition (POD) and inexact robust principal component analysis (IRPCA) in conjunction with measurements of intermittent crushing at different ice speeds. Both decompositions show that most of the energy is captured in a ten-dimensional space; however, the corresponding eigenvalues are different between the decompositions. While POD-based modes have low energy contributions at the first subspace dimensions, IRPCA-based modes have larger energy contributions. This result is consistent with the reconstruction of the time history of the pressure sum using first three empirical modes, where POD and IRPCA-based modes yield similar accuracy at the same subspace dimension. Although both methods successfully illustrate the dominant pressure modes that are active in the system, IRPCA method is found to be more effective than POD in terms of differentiating the contribution of each mode because of its ability to better separate low-rank and sparse components (measurement error and/or noise) in the dataset.

Files

1_s2.0_S0165232X18301599_main_... (pdf)
(pdf | 4.08 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 09-08-2022
License info not available