Hybrid RANS-LES Turbulence Models for FSI Application
M. Mittal (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)
Alexander Van Zuijlen – Mentor (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)
E.M.A Frederix – Mentor (NRG (Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group) Petten)
K. Zwijsen – Mentor (NRG (Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group) Petten)
M. Gerritsma – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)
J Sodja – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Group Sodja)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
This thesis investigates the application of hybrid turbulence models for fluid-structure interaction (FSI) to evaluate phenomena such as vortex-induced vibration (VIV) in tube rods within nuclear reactors. The study aimed to identify and validate the most effective hybrid modeling approaches to improve the accuracy and efficiency of FSI simulations in this critical application. Hybrid RANS-LES models aim to use Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) modeling in regions where the flow is relatively steady and well-predicted by the RANS approach, while switching to Large Eddy Simulation (LES) in regions where turbulence is more dynamic and complex. This switch can either be very explicit and segregate the domain into RANS and LES zones or it can be a subtle modification in the transport equations using either RANS or LES as baseline.
The research began with a detailed literature review, leading to the selection of four promising hybrid turbulence models: Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (IDDES), Scale Adaptive Simulation (SAS), Partially Averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS), and Struct Epsilon (SE). These models were implemented and tested through numerical case setups to validate their performance against established reference data for crossflow over a circular cylinder at a Reynolds number (Re) of 3900.
A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the performance of the selected models. Based on this analysis, two models were shortlisted for further testing. These models were subjected to additional validation on a rigid body motion case to ensure their reliability and accuracy in FSI applications.
In this validation, the models were used to simulate flow over an elastically mounted rigid cylinder in crossflow to evaluate the frequency and displacement of its oscillation. They were tested at different velocities to determine the amplitude and frequency response. The SE model was observed to be more robust and efficient than IDDES.
In conclusion, the research provides validation, selection and comparison of different hybrid turbulence models for FSI applications. Recommendations for future research are also provided to further refine these modeling approaches.