Sensitivity analysis of data-driven groundwater forecasts to hydroclimatic controls in irrigated croplands

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Alessandro Amaranto (University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Politecnico di Milano, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

F Pianosi (University of Bristol)

D.P. Solomatine (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, TU Delft - Water Resources, Water Problem Institute of RAS)

G. Corzo (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

F. Munoz-Arriola (University of Nebraska–Lincoln)

Research Group
Water Resources
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124957
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Water Resources
Volume number
587

Abstract

In the last decades, advancements in computational science have greatly expanded the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in hydrogeology, including applications on groundwater forecast, variable selection, extended lead-times, and regime-specific analysis. However, ANN-model performance often omits the sensitivity to observational uncertainties in hydroclimate forcings. The goal of this paper is to implement a data-driven modeling framework for assessing the sensitivity of ANN-based groundwater forecasts to the uncertainties in observational inputs across space, time, and hydrological regimes. The objectives are two-folded. The first objective is to couple an ANN model with the PAWN sensitivity analysis (SA). The second objective is to evaluate the scale- and process-dependent sensitivities of groundwater forecasts to hydroclimate inputs, computing the sensitivity index in groundwater wells (1) across the whole time-series (for the global sensitivity analysis); (2) across the output sub-regions with conditions of water deficit and water surplus (for the ‘regional’ sensitivity analysis); and (3) at each time step (for the time-varying sensitivity analysis). The implementation of the ANN-PAWN occurs in 68 wells across the Northern High Plains aquifer, USA, with pre-time-step rainfall, evapotranspiration, snowmelt, streamflow, and groundwater measurements as inputs. Results show that evapotranspiration and rainfall are the major sources of uncertainty, with the latter being particularly relevant in water surplus conditions and the former in water deficit conditions. The time-varying sensitivity analysis leads to the identification of localized sensitivities to other sources of uncertainty, as snowmelt in spring or river flow during the annual peak period at the groundwater level.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.