A Taxonomic Odyssey

Evolution, Criticisms, and Future Directions of Driving Automation Taxonomies – The Case of SAE J3016

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Soyeon Kim (TU Delft - Traffic Systems Engineering)

Fjollë Novakazi (Örebro University)

Elisabeth Shi (Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt))

Ilse M. Harms (Dienst Wegverkeer)

Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.101858 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Journal title
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Volume number
36
Article number
101858
Downloads counter
19
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

While the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) International’s classification system (J3016) has provided a framework for categorising sustained driving automation systems, concerns have arisen about its clarity and ability to incorporate emerging technologies . Therefore, this study explores how various stakeholders, including end users, vehicle manufacturers, and policymakers, use the driving automation taxonomy. The results show that driving automation taxonomy is communicated through media, incorporated into vehicle purchasing decisions for users, and utilised for external and internal communication by vehicle manufacturers and policymakers. The discussion highlights that utilising specialised terminology in automation enhances communication efficiency. However, there is also a discrepancy between the SAE J3016, which is today’s prevalent taxonomy, and their audience in terms of both (1) clarity provided by the taxonomy vs. understanding of the stakeholders and (2) topics addressed by the taxonomy vs. needs of the stakeholders. The study also highlights that, while SAE J3016 is being criticised, proposing a clearly better taxonomy is far from straightforward. However, we underscore the importance of revising and updating the current taxonomy to align with stakeholder needs and technological advancements. By enhancing the clarity and relevance of the driving automation taxonomy, stakeholders can make more informed decisions, fostering innovation and improving communication across the industry.