Determination of specific surface area of irregular aggregate by random sectioning and its comparison with conventional methods

Journal article (2021)

Authors

Qiang Ren Universiteit Gent, Tongji University
Luchuan DING Universiteit Gent
Xiaodi Dai Universiteit Gent
Zhengwu Jiang Tongji University
G. Ye Universiteit Gent, Materials and Environment - CEG
Geert De Schutter Universiteit Gent
Research Group
Materials and Environment (CEG) (TU Delft)
Aggregates Computed tomography BET Random sectioning Specific surface area Spherical assumption
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2021

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Department

Materials- Mechanics- Management & Design

Research Group

Materials and Environment

Abstract

A two-dimensional (2D) image-based methodology was proposed to measure the specific surface area (SSA, specified as the surface area per unit volume) of irregular aggregate by random sectioning. Conventional methods including spherical assumption, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and computed tomography (CT) tests were used and compared in this study. Results show that spherical assumption provides the lowest SSA among these methods since the feature of anisotropy in dimension is not considered. SSA by BET test has one order of magnitude higher value than others, which is attributed to the fact that BET method measures each position of particles that nitrogen molecule can be adsorbed on during the applied relative pressure, based on the ‘pixel’ of nitrogen molecule. The proposed random sectioning method presents very similar SSA result compared to CT method, indicating that it can be considered as a reliable method. To improve the estimation of SSA by random sectioning method, factors that may influence SSA result were analyzed. Results indicate that the number of samples should be high enough to reach a constant result and the thresholding algorithm should be adequate. Besides, a higher resolution of pixel provides a higher SSA value. The comparison among these methods demonstrate that it is necessary to determine the scale at which the features of the surface are supposed to be captured before selecting the optimal testing method.