Grid-integrated hydrogen production systems

A holistic analytical modeling framework for stability assessment and dynamic interaction

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Chunjun Huang (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

José Luis Rueda Torres (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Nakul Narayanan Kuruveettil (Government Engineering College, Thrissur)

Xin Jin (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.155391 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
Journal title
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume number
240
Article number
155391
Downloads counter
6
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Grid-integrated electrolyzer systems are increasingly deployed for green hydrogen production, which is a promising pathway for energy decarbonization. However, their operation is challenged by insufficiently understood dynamic interactions among the grid-side rectifier, the buck converter, their control loops, and the electrolyzer stack. To address this issue, this paper develops a holistic analytical framework for such systems. A unified model is derived by integrating the rectifier, the buck converter, their control loops, and the electrolyzer stack. Based on this model, eigenvalue, participation-factor, and frequency-response analyses are conducted to systematically quantify stability characteristics, internal dynamic couplings, and parameter sensitivities. For a 2 MW electrolyzer case, the results reveal that excessive rectifier or buck-control bandwidths can independently trigger distinct oscillatory instabilities. On this basis, engineering-oriented controller-tuning guidelines are established, recommending about 10–50 Hz for the phase-locked loop, below about 60 Hz for the DC-link voltage controller, and about 20–150 Hz for the buck power controller. The analysis further shows that properly designed buck bandwidth renders the system-level power response weakly sensitive to slow electrolyzer dynamics dominated by double-layer capacitance, thereby mitigating uncertainty in this capacitance and clarifying the applicability of reduced-order electrolyzer models. These findings are corroborated by PSCAD/EMTDC time-domain simulations, verifying the effectiveness of the proposed analytical model. Additional verifications under frequency and voltage disturbances further confirm the model’s predictive capability, with maximum relative errors of 0.264%–1.486% and 0.153%–5.922%, respectively. Overall, this work offers an efficient analytical tool for stability-oriented control design, model-fidelity selection, and dynamic interaction analysis of grid-integrated electrolyzer systems.