European Diversity

A Building Site Experience

Report (2016)
Author(s)

P.A. Ruben

Contributor(s)

M.A.B. Chao-Duivis – Contributor

M. Lang – Contributor

J. Garcés – Contributor

E. Dekker – Contributor

Copyright
© Image material and drawings are subject to copyright of the indicated party. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of any of the parties involved on the building site. It is prohibited to replicate this internship report or a part of it without explicit authorization of the author. This applies to all content including texts, photographs and drawings.
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Copyright
© Image material and drawings are subject to copyright of the indicated party. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of any of the parties involved on the building site. It is prohibited to replicate this internship report or a part of it without explicit authorization of the author. This applies to all content including texts, photographs and drawings.
Coordinates
48.588217, 7.747781
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Dutch and French construction law show fundamentally different approaches. This internship report aims to illustrate the impact which legislation has on building site interactions. Part of the research was a 5 week internship for Garcés-de Seta-Bonet, the Catalan architect office awarded with the renovation and partial reconstruction of the Palais de Justice, Strasbourg, France. The report starts with an analysis of the the historic development, present differences and responses to modern challenges. A general introduction to standards of French public projects and a glossary of major technical terms precedes the case study. The latter one discusses specific power distribution, relations of among parties and their respective interests. For instance, a range of standardized processes (e.g. validation of plans, payment) involving different actors is illustrated with documents such as technical drawings. The closing part focusses on contrasting architectural practices by interviewing French, Dutch and Spanish architects. Finally, conclusions about the architect's professions and prospects are drawn on a European level.

Files

License info not available