Influence of Sea Level Rise on a Coastal Barrier System and Its Reliability Against Future Storm Surges in the Houston-Galveston Area, Texas

Conference Paper (2025)
Author(s)

Seokmin Son (University of Michigan)

Meri Davlasheridze (Texas A&M University Galveston)

Ashley D. Ross (Texas A&M University Galveston)

Jeremy D. Bricker (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk, University of Michigan)

Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Pages (from-to)
256-259
Publisher
IAHR
ISBN (print)
9789083558950
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The Ike Dike is a concept of coastal barrier system designed to protect the Houston-Galveston area (HGA), which is highly susceptible to flood risks from storm surges. The barrier system has been proposed with different alignments and configurations: movable, permanent, and extended permanent barrier systems. We have evaluated and compared the feasibility of three barrier types as a function of sea level rise (SLR), taking into account the reliability of the movable barrier. We employ the Delft3D Flexible Mesh suite to simulate storm surges in a hydrodynamic model, incorporating pressure and wind velocity fields spatialized by the Holland’s model from synthetic storm tracks. Simulations are driven by a range of SLR projections and synthetic storm tracks, with different barrier types. Probabilistic flood depths are predicted for specific return periods by fitting the 30-year maxima flood depths from the simulations to a probability distribution function. Using the CoreLogic database of residential properties in the HGA and building damage functions, we calculate probabilistic flood damages for each predicted flood depth. This allowed us to quantify flood risk as the expected annual damage, integrated over a range of return periods. Our results indicate that the permanent and extended permanent barrier systems are more effective at mitigating storm surge risk than the movable barrier system. Moreover, the necessity of the extended permanent barrier system becomes more significant as SLR increases.

Files

41WC-P0212.pdf
(pdf | 1.17 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 27-12-2025
Taverne