The role of epidemic spreading in seizure dynamics and epilepsy surgery

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Ana P. Millán (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Elisabeth C. W. van Straaten (Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Cornelis J. Stam (Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Ida A. Nissen (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Sander Idema (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience)

Johannes C. Baayen (Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Piet Van Mieghem (TU Delft - Network Architectures and Services)

Arjan Hillebrand (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience)

Research Group
Network Architectures and Services
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00305 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
Network Architectures and Services
Journal title
Network Neuroscience
Issue number
2
Volume number
7
Pages (from-to)
811-843
Downloads counter
230
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Epilepsy surgery is the treatment of choice for drug-resistant epilepsy patients, but only leads to seizure freedom for roughly two in three patients. To address this problem, we designed a patient-specific epilepsy surgery model combining large-scale magnetoencephalography (MEG) brain networks with an epidemic spreading model. This simple model was enough to reproduce the stereo-tactical electroencephalography (SEEG) seizure propagation patterns of all patients (N = 15), when considering the resection areas (RA) as the epidemic seed. Moreover, the goodness of fit of the model predicted surgical outcome. Once adapted for each patient, the model can generate alternative hypothesis of the seizure onset zone and test different resection strategies in silico. Overall, our findings indicate that spreading models based on patient-specific MEG connectivity can be used to predict surgical outcomes, with better fit results and greater reduction on seizure propagation linked to higher likelihood of seizure freedom after surgery. Finally, we introduced a population model that can be individualized by considering only the patient-specific MEG network, and showed that it not only conserves but improves the group classification. Thus, it may pave the way to generalize this framework to patients without SEEG recordings, reduce the risk of overfitting and improve the stability of the analyses.