The role of epidemic spreading in seizure dynamics and epilepsy surgery
Ana P. Millán (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
Elisabeth C.W. van Straaten (Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Systems and Network Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
Cornelis J Stam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging)
Ida A. Nissen (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
Sander Idema (Amsterdam Neuroscience, Cancer Biology and Immonology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Systems and Network Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
Johannes C. Baayen (Amsterdam Neuroscience, Cancer Biology and Immonology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Systems and Network Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Imaging and Biomarkers)
P.F.A. Van Mieghem (TU Delft - Network Architectures and Services)
Arjan Hillebrand (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Systems and Network Neurosciences)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Epilepsy surgery is the treatment of choice for drug-resistant epilepsy patients, but only leads to seizure freedom for roughly two in three patients. To address this problem, we designed a patient-specific epilepsy surgery model combining large-scale magnetoencephalography (MEG) brain networks with an epidemic spreading model. This simple model was enough to reproduce the stereo-tactical electroencephalography (SEEG) seizure propagation patterns of all patients (N = 15), when considering the resection areas (RA) as the epidemic seed. Moreover, the goodness of fit of the model predicted surgical outcome. Once adapted for each patient, the model can generate alternative hypothesis of the seizure onset zone and test different resection strategies in silico. Overall, our findings indicate that spreading models based on patient-specific MEG connectivity can be used to predict surgical outcomes, with better fit results and greater reduction on seizure propagation linked to higher likelihood of seizure freedom after surgery. Finally, we introduced a population model that can be individualized by considering only the patient-specific MEG network, and showed that it not only conserves but improves the group classification. Thus, it may pave the way to generalize this framework to patients without SEEG recordings, reduce the risk of overfitting and improve the stability of the analyses.