Responsible innovation across societal sectors

a practice perspective on Quadruple Helix collaboration

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Johannes Starkbaum (Institute for Advanced Studies)

Robert Braun (Institute for Advanced Studies)

Vincent Blok (Wageningen University & Research)

Fabian Schroth (Wageningen University & Research)

Johann Jakob Häußermann (Technische Universität München)

Claudia Colonnello (e Knowledge and Innovation)

Eugen Popa (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Renate Wesselink (Wageningen University & Research)

Anna Gerhardus (Institute for Advanced Studies)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414531
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Issue number
1
Volume number
11
Article number
2414531
Downloads counter
212
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

To address societal challenges, research and innovation approaches, involving a wide range of actors, are increasingly promoted by policy communities. This paper explores the practice of Quadruple Helix collaborations for responsible innovation and how these implement the theoretical ambition of including actors from different societal sectors in innovation, including actors from the fields of arts, media and civil society, which is conceptualized as the Fourth Helix in this concept. Referring to cross-sector collaboration literature and based on an empirical investigation, we explore which actors, representing the Fourth Helix, actually engage in innovation collaborations, how this engagement plays out in practice, and the institutional and systemic dynamics involved in output and value creation. We rely on data from three Social Labs in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands, which constitute qualitative, change-oriented research processes, where we researched and engaged with actors from cases constituting- or aiming for a Quadruple Helix collaboration. This was accompanied by a desktop study including qualitative interviews of 51 further cases. We find that the actual engagement of actors from civil society is fragile and that forces beyond Quadruple Helix cases impact these quite firmly in some cases.