Material properties and image cues for convincing grapes

The know-how of the 17th-century pictorial recipe by Willem Beurs

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Francesca Di Cicco (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Lisa Wiersma (Universiteit Utrecht)

Maarten Wijntjes (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Sylvia Pont (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Research Group
Human Technology Relations
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10019 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Human Technology Relations
Journal title
Art and Perception
Issue number
3-4
Volume number
8
Pages (from-to)
337-362
Downloads counter
316
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Painters mastered replicating the regularities of the visual patterns that we use to infer different materials and their properties, via meticulous observation of the way light reveals the world's textures. The convincing depiction of bunches of grapes is particularly interesting. A convincing portrayal of grapes requires a balanced combination of different material properties, such as glossiness, translucency and bloom, as we learn from the 17th-century pictorial recipe by Willem Beurs. These material properties, together with three-dimensionality and convincingness, were rated in experiment 1 on 17th-century paintings, and in experiment 2 on optical mixtures of layers derived from a reconstruction of one of the 17th-century paintings, made following Beurs's recipe. In experiment 3 only convincingness was rated, using again the 17th-century paintings. With a multiple linear regression, we found glossiness, translucency and bloom not to be good predictors of convincingness of the 17thcentury paintings, but they were for the reconstruction. Overall, convincingness was judged consistently, showing that people agreed on its meaning. However, the agreement was higher when the material properties indicated by Beurs were also rated (experiment 1) than if not (experiment 3), suggesting that these properties are associated with what makes grapes look convincing. The 17thcentury workshop practices showed more variability than standardization of grapes, as different combinations of the material properties could lead to a highly convincing representation. Beurs's recipe provides a list of all the possible optical interactions of grapes, and the economic yet effective image cues to render them.

Files

License info not available