How to claim what is mine

Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

M Bos-De Vos (TU Delft - DesIgning Value in Ecosystems)

Bente Lieftink (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen)

Kristina Lauche (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen)

Research Group
DesIgning Value in Ecosystems
Copyright
© 2019 M. Bos-de Vos, B.M. Lieftink, K. Lauche
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joz004
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 M. Bos-de Vos, B.M. Lieftink, K. Lauche
Research Group
DesIgning Value in Ecosystems
Issue number
2
Volume number
6
Pages (from-to)
128-155
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Professional roles within inter-organizational projects have become increasingly diverse and contested, yet little is known about how professionals react to such threats of marginalization. Drawing on empirical data from interviews with architects, a profession in which historically established role boundaries have become particularly blurred, we analyse how professionals negotiate their roles in
inter-organizational projects. We identified three types of boundary work—reinstating, bending, and pioneering role boundaries—and illustrate their antecedents and effects for project collaboration. These categories exemplify different responses to the threat of marginalization depending upon professionals’ perceptions of what the specific project called for. Our study provides important insights into boundary work practices emerging in the context of inter-organizational projects and how professionals adjust their claims-making to perceived opportunities, thereby triggering incremental as well as more radical changes in the professional role structures.