Multi-mirror adaptive optics for control of thermally induced aberrations in extreme ultraviolet lithography

Conference Paper (2016)
Author(s)

Michel Habets (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Joni Scholten (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Siep Weiland (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Wim M. Coene (TU Delft - ImPhys/Optics)

Research Group
ImPhys/Optics
Copyright
© 2016 Michel Habets, Joni Scholten, Siep Weiland, W.M.J.M. Coene
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2219168
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 Michel Habets, Joni Scholten, Siep Weiland, W.M.J.M. Coene
Research Group
ImPhys/Optics
Volume number
9776
Pages (from-to)
1-12
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-510600119
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The imaging quality of the projection optics of an extreme ultraviolet lithography scanner degrades under the influence of thermally induced deformations of its mirrors. Wavefronts of different reticle points encounter different parts of the deformed mirrors, resulting in a field dependent wavefront error. This paper presents how ideas from multi-conjugate adaptive optics can be used to reduce these thermally induced aberrations. To this end a generic deformable mirror model is implemented. Linear actuator sensitivities are derived directly, based on nominal ray locations and directions, enabling fast prototyping. An integrated opto-thermo-mechanical mirror heating model is used to determine the evolution of thermally induced abberations over time. This transient simulation is used to analyze four different adaptive optics configurations and two different control algorithms. It is shown that by employing the multi-objective goal-attainment method, it is possible to improve the optical performance significantly when compared to minimizing the ℓ2-norm of the total residual wavefront error vector.

Files

97762D.pdf
(pdf | 1.49 Mb)
License info not available