Efficient Data-driven Reference Governor Design for Safe Evasive Manoeuvring

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Petar Velchev (Student TU Delft, Capgemini Engineering)

Alberto Bertipaglia (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Felipe Santafe (Toyota)

Mohammad Khosravi (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Barys Shyrokau (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Research Group
Team Khosravi
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2026.3703595 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Team Khosravi
Journal title
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Issue number
8
Volume number
11
Pages (from-to)
9819-9826
Downloads counter
17
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper presents a novel data-driven Reference Governor with Model Predictive Control, integrating local motion replanning and path following for collision avoidance. Employing a model-free Reference Governor, the proposed framework utilises system knowledge through Bayesian Optimisation to augment predetermined evasive trajectories, minimising pathfollowing errors and simultaneously ensuring obstacle safety margins. A single-track vehicle model in combination with a nonlinear tyre model is used to capture the vehicle's dynamics. The optimised control action is the vehicle steering angle, whilst the Reference Governor optimises parameters of a sigmoid reference signal to minimise the tracking error and guarantee safety with respect to obstacles in emergency manoeuvres. The proposed approach is evaluated on a single lane change using a highfidelity simulation environment, and its performance is compared to a baseline controller integrating path following and obstacle avoidance. The results demonstrate a 14% reduction in safety critical overshoot, maximising obstacle safety distance and a four times lower controller cycle time compared to the baseline. Furthermore, through a robustness analysis, it is demonstrated that the proposed approach is more robust towards model mismatches and perception-based errors, as seen by average 30% and 40% reductions in near-miss and collision rates.