Impact of pulsed jet actuators on aircraft mass and fuel consumption

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

FGA Bertels

REC van Dijk (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

R.J.M. Elmendorp

R. Vos (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion
Copyright
© 2016 F.G.A. Bertels, R.E.C. van Dijk, R.J.M. Elmendorp, Roelof Vos
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-016-0201-8
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 F.G.A. Bertels, R.E.C. van Dijk, R.J.M. Elmendorp, Roelof Vos
Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion
Issue number
4
Volume number
7
Pages (from-to)
535-549
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Pulsed jet actuators (PJAs) are one of the candidate technologies to be integrated in Fowler flaps to increase the maximum lift coefficient of transport aircraft in the landing configuration. The total system consists of the actuators plus sensors, a piping system to supply pressurized air and a (redundant) power and communication system to provide actuator control. In this paper, it is investigated what increase in the maximum lift coefficient is required to justify the added weight and power off-takes that accompany the integration of pulsed jet actuators. This is done by making an automated design process for the overall aircraft, the piping assembly system, and the electrical wiring interconnection system. These last two sub-systems rely on KBE techniques that automate dimensioning and performance evaluation. A test case is specified that encompasses the design of a typical single-aisle mid-range aircraft with and without the PJA system installed. It is concluded that the introduction of the PJA system requires at least an increase in maximum lift coefficient of 0.2 to justify the increase in system mass and power off-takes. Furthermore, it is shown that if the maximum lift coefficient increases with 0.4, only small reductions in maximum take-off weight (−0.3 %) and operating empty weight (−0.6 %) can be expected, while the total fuel burn remains virtually constant.