Synchronized Helix wake mixing control

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

A.A.W. van Vondelen (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

M. Coquelet (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

S.T. Navalkar (Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy)

J.W. van Wingerden (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

Research Group
Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2411-2025
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Issue number
10
Volume number
10
Pages (from-to)
2411-2433
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Wind farm control optimizes wind turbines collectively, implying that some turbines operate suboptimally to benefit others, resulting in a farm-level performance increase. This study presents a novel control strategy to optimize wind farm performance by synchronizing the wake dynamics of multiple turbines using an extended Kalman filter (EKF)-based phase estimator in a Helix control framework. The proposed method influences downstream turbine wake dynamics by accurately estimating the phase shift of the upstream periodic Helix wake and applying it to its downstream control actions with additional phase offsets. The estimator integrates a dynamic blade element momentum model to improve wind speed estimation accuracy under dynamic conditions. The results, validated through turbulent large-eddy simulations in a three-turbine array, demonstrate that the EKF-based estimator reliably tracks the phase of the incoming Helix wake, with slight offsets attributed to model discrepancies. When integrated with the closed-loop synchronization controller, significant power enhancement with respect to the single-turbine Helix can be attained (up to +10 % on the third turbine), depending on the chosen phase offset. Flow analysis reveals that the optimal phase offset sustains the natural Helix oscillation throughout the array, whereas the worst phase offset creates destructive interference with the incoming wake, which appears to negatively impact wake recovery.