Time Dummy Hedonic and Quality-Adjusted Unit Value Indexes

Do They Really Differ?

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Jan de Haan (Statistics Netherlands (CBS), TU Delft - OLD Housing Systems)

Frances Krsinich (Statistics New Zealand)

Research Group
OLD Housing Systems
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12304 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Research Group
OLD Housing Systems
Issue number
4
Volume number
64
Pages (from-to)
757-776
Downloads counter
305

Abstract

One of the main approaches to constructing quality-adjusted price indexes is the time dummy hedonic method. An alternative but rather unconventional method is the estimation of quality-adjusted unit value indexes. An advantage of the latter method is the interpretation of the implicit quantity index as the simple ratio of quality-adjusted or standardized quantities. In this paper we compare the two methods. We show that the expenditure-share weighted time dummy price index and the quality-adjusted unit value index can be written as ratios of weighted geometric and harmonic means, respectively, of quality-adjusted prices. Next, we argue that the two indexes will have similar trends and volatility if the quality-adjusted prices in the quality-adjusted unit value index are based on the estimated time dummy model. Our theoretical findings are illustrated on New Zealand scanner data for seven consumer electronics products.