A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for analyzing the risks and benefits of opening data

Conference Paper (2018)
Author(s)

Ahmad Luthfi (Universitas Islam Indonesia, TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology)

Zeenat Rehena (TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology, Aliah University)

Marijn Janssen (TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology)

Joep Crompvoets (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)

Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_36
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Volume number
11195 LNCS
Pages (from-to)
397-412
Publisher
Springer
ISBN (print)
9783030021306
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Governments are releasing their data to the public to accomplish benefits like the creation of transparency, accountability, citizen engagement and to enable business innovation. At the same time, decision-makers are reluctant to open their data due to some potential risks like misuse, sensitivity, ownership, and inaccuracy of the data. The goal of the study presented in this paper is to develop a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (FMCDM) approach to analyze the risks and benefits to determine the decision to open a dataset. FMCDM is chosen due to its capability to measure and weight the relative importance of the criteria. FMCDM need the weighting of criteria as input. For this Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is utilized by collecting input from experts’ knowledge and expertise. The scores for each criterion are summed up to rank the importance of the alternatives. Four main criteria are used, e.g. data sensitivity and data ownership representing risks criteria, and data availability and data trustworthy as benefits criteria. For each criterion, there were two sub-criteria identified. Four types of decisions to open data can be made: completely open, maintain suppression, provide limited access, and remain closed. A health patient record dataset is used to illustrate the approach. In further research, we recommend to develop automated approaches that take a dataset as an input and can provide an advice.

Files

Luthfi2018_Chapter_AFuzzyMulti... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.23 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 12-04-2019
License info not available