Evaluating Crowdworkers as a Proxy for Online Learners in Video-Based Learning Contexts

Journal Article (2018)
Authors

D.J. Davis (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)

C Hauff (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)

G. J. Houben (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)

Research Group
Web Information Systems
Copyright
© 2018 D.J. Davis, C. Hauff, G.J.P.M. Houben
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3274311
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 D.J. Davis, C. Hauff, G.J.P.M. Houben
Research Group
Web Information Systems
Issue number
CSCW
Volume number
2
Pages (from-to)
1-16
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3274311
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Crowdsourcing has emerged as an effective method of scaling-up tasks previously reserved for a small set of experts. Accordingly, researchers in the large-scale online learning space have begun to employ crowdworkers to conduct research about large-scale, open online learning. We here report results from a crowdsourcing study (N=135) to evaluate the extent to which crowdworkers and MOOC learners behave comparably on lecture viewing and quiz tasks---the most utilized learning activities in MOOCs. This serves to (i) validate the assumption of previous research that crowdworkers are indeed reliable proxies of online learners and (ii) address the potential of employing crowdworkers as a means of online learning environment testing. Overall, we observe mixed results---in certain contexts (quiz performance and video watching behavior) crowdworkers appear to behave comparably to MOOC learners, and in other situations (interactions with in-video quizzes), their behaviors appear to be disparate. We conclude that future research should be cautious if employing crowdworkers to carry out learning tasks, as the two populations do not behave comparably on all learning-related activities.

Files

Cscw042_davis.pdf
(pdf | 2.29 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 31-05-2019
License info not available