Pre-Trained Models on Scanned Historic Watermarks
A Comparative Analysis Exploring Pre-Trained Models on Scanned Historic Watermarks
A. Marin (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)
Martin Skrodzki – Mentor (TU Delft - Computer Graphics and Visualisation)
Jorge Martinez – Mentor (TU Delft - Multimedia Computing)
Christoph Lofi – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
This paper tackles the problem of evaluating the task of finding similar scanned historical watermarks - small images embedded in historical paper that have been digitized to be processed on a computer - using pre-trained neural networks. This research aims to identify an efficient and accurate alternative to the traditional, time-consuming manual detection methods for finding similar watermarks. The primary issue addressed is the inefficiency of these manual methods. The evaluation focuses on finding similar watermarks for a specific query watermark, assessing the efficacy of neural networks in comparison to a prior art system that employs traditional image processing techniques. This comparison aims to determine how well these neural networks perform in the task of watermark similarity detection. The study involves a dataset of 500 labeled images tested in two distinct contexts: one using unprocessed images and another using images processed to keep only the watermark outline. The results show that pre-trained models achieve higher accuracy and time efficiency compared to the prior art system that uses image processing. These models demonstrate significant effectiveness in watermark recognition and comparison, with each network achieving over 80% accuracy for traced watermarks. EfficientNetB0 achieved 94.66%, VGG16 89.33%, ResNet50 86.67%, and InceptionV3 84%, while the prior art system gets 64,8%. These results conclude that these models are valuable tools in the field of watermark recognition and comparison.