How to conduct more systematic reviews of agent-based models and foster theory development
Taking stock and looking ahead
Sebastian Achter (Hamburg University of Technology)
Melania Borit (UiT the Arctic University of Norway)
Clémentine Cottineau-Mugadza (TU Delft - Urban Studies)
Matthias Meyer (Hamburg University of Technology)
J. Gary Polhill (The James Hutton Institute)
Viktoriia Radchuk (Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Agent-based models (ABMs) are increasingly utilized in ecology and related fields, yet concerns persist regarding the lack of consideration for lessons learned from previous models. This study explores the potential of systematically conducted ABM reviews to contribute to cumulative science and theory development by synthesizing individual ABM findings more effectively. We are conducting a meta-review of ABM reviews to assess current practices, compare them to systematic literature review (SLR) literature recommendations, and evaluate their engagement with theory and theory development. Our analysis of the ecology and social science sample reveals that many reviews are not conducted systematically and lack transparency. The analysis step of SLRs holds significant potential to advance theory development. Reviews primarily focus on model design, while other avenues of theory development receive less attention. Our findings suggest ways to improve current practices and may guide future ABM reviews via benchmarks for methodological decisions and dimensions for advancing theory development.
help_outline