Narratives and counter-narratives in sustainability transitions

A study on the Port of Rotterdam from a multi-level perspective

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Dr. ir. Johan Ninan (TU Delft - Integral Design & Management)

C. Stam (Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, TU Delft - Design & Construction Management)

Alfons Van Marrewijk (BI Norwegian Business School , TU Delft - Design & Construction Management, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Research Group
Integral Design & Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102766
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Integral Design & Management
Issue number
7
Volume number
43
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Infrastructure projects can act as niches for innovation development, contribute to strategic goals of network owners, and drive broader systemic transitions. However, limited research has examined how sustainability transitions are shaped through narratives and counternarratives around infrastructure projects. Using a case study of the port of Rotterdam, we analyze how three embedded projects - Maasvlakte 2, RDM Campus, and the Hydrogen Pipeline - reflected and shaped evolving narratives and counter-narratives over 20-years. Grounded in the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP), the study demonstrates how an infrastructure owner like the Port of Rotterdam Authority (PoRA) strategically mobilized narrative framing to reshape existing regimes over time. The study contributes to the debate on project management and transition studies by highlighting how infrastructure project owners respond to transition-related tensions by shaping, defending, and adapting project narratives over time, thereby influencing sustainability trajectories.