Opportunities and barriers for water co-governance-A critical analysis of seven cases of diffuse water pollution from agriculture in Europe, Australia and North America

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Morten Graversgaard (Aarhus University)

Beatrice Hedelin (Karlstad University)

Laurence Smith (SOAS University of London)

Flemming Gertz (Landbrug and Fødevarer F.M.B.A.)

Anker Lajer Højberg (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland)

John Langford (University of Melbourne)

Grit Martinez (Ecologic Institute)

Erik Mostert (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Emilia Ptak (Aarhus University)

Heidi Peterson (International Plant Nutrition Institute, University of Minnesota System)

Nico Stelljes (Ecologic Institute)

Cors van den Brink (University Medical Center Groningen, Haskoning)

Jens Christian Refsgaard (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland)

Research Group
Water Resources
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051634 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Research Group
Water Resources
Journal title
Sustainability
Issue number
5
Volume number
10
Article number
1634
Downloads counter
358
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture (DWPA) and its governance has received increased attention as a policy concern across the globe. Mitigation of DWPA is a complex problem that requires a mix of policy instruments and a multi-agency, broad societal response. In this paper, opportunities and barriers for developing co-governance, defined as collaborative societal involvement in the functions of government, and its suitability for mitigation of DWPA are reviewed using seven case studies in Europe (Poland, Denmark, Sweden, The Netherlands and UK), Australia (Murray-Darling Basin) and North America (State of Minnesota). An analytical framework for assessing opportunities and barriers of co-governance was developed and applied in this review. Results indicated that five key issues constitute both opportunities and barriers, and include: (i) pressure for change; (ii) connected governance structures and allocation of resources and funding; (iii) leadership and establishment of partnerships through capacity building; (iv) use and co-production of knowledge; and (v) time commitment to develop water co-governance.