An Analysis of the State of Framework Development for Reasoning in Smart Cyber- hysical Systems

Conference Paper (2018)
Author(s)

S. Tepjit (TU Delft - Cyber-Physical Systems)

I Horvath (TU Delft - Cyber-Physical Systems)

Zoltán Rusák (TU Delft - Cyber-Physical Systems)

Research Group
Cyber-Physical Systems
Copyright
© 2018 S. Tepjit, I. Horvath, Z. Rusak
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-898-3-82
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 S. Tepjit, I. Horvath, Z. Rusak
Research Group
Cyber-Physical Systems
Pages (from-to)
82-92
ISBN (print)
978-1-61499-897-6
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-61499-898-3
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Smart CPSs (S-CPSs) have been evolving beyond what was identified by the traditional definitions of CPSs. The objective of our research is to investigate the concepts and implementations of S-CPSs, and more specifically, the frameworks proposed for the fuzzy front end of their reasoning processes. The objectives of the paper are: (i) overview of the various framework concepts and implementations in the context of S-CPS, and (ii) analyze the presented frameworks from the points of view of reasoning processes of S-CPSs that included the concepts of structuring knowledge, building awareness, situated reasoning, decision making, and system adaptation. Our major findings are: (i) model-based and composability approaches do not support a development of S-CPSs; (ii) awareness and adaptation behaviors are considered as system level characteristics of S-CPSs that are not achieved by traditional design approaches; (iii) a new framework development should support a compositional design for reasoning in S-CPS. Based on the findings above, we argue that a development of S-CPSs should be supported by a proper framework development for compositional design of smart reasoning and coping with the challenges of compositionality requires both software-level integration and holistic fusion of knowledge by means of semantic transformations. It needs further investigation if a compositionality enabling framework should appear in the form of a meta-framework (abstract) or in the form of a semantically integrated (concrete) framework.