Ψ -PIV

a novel framework to study unsteady microfluidic flows

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

A. Kislaya (TU Delft - Fluid Mechanics)

Antaran Deka (Student TU Delft)

Peter Veenstra (Shell)

Daniel S.W. See-Wai Tam (TU Delft - Fluid Mechanics)

J Westerweel (TU Delft - Fluid Mechanics)

Research Group
Fluid Mechanics
Copyright
© 2020 A. Kislaya, Antaran Deka, Peter Veenstra, D.S.W. Tam, J. Westerweel
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2855-6
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 A. Kislaya, Antaran Deka, Peter Veenstra, D.S.W. Tam, J. Westerweel
Research Group
Fluid Mechanics
Issue number
2
Volume number
61
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Abstract: In microscopic particle image velocimetry (micro-PIV), correlation averaging over multiple frames is often required, leading to a loss in temporal resolution, therefore limiting the measurement accuracy for unsteady flows. Here, we present a new PIV method suitable to study steady and unsteady laminar flows between parallel plates (i.e., Hele-Shaw flow), which is a common flow configuration in microfluidic applications. Our method reduces the effective seeding density and yields similar if not higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared to conventional micro-PIV. We call this algorithm Ψ -PIV. Ψ -PIV requires a much smaller number of frames to reach the same SNR compared to the widely used correlation averaging method. This leads to a significant improvement of the temporal resolution. The Ψ -PIV algorithm is used in an experimental investigation of steady and unsteady flows in a Hele-Shaw cell. Our experiment shows that Ψ -PIV reduces the number of required frames by 8 times and 30 times compared to the frames required by conventional PIV for steady and unsteady laminar flow, respectively. In this study, PIV and Ψ -PIV use a single-pass cross-correlation to present the underlying difference between the two approaches. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].