ConceptEVA

Concept-Based Interactive Exploration and Customization of Document Summaries

Conference Paper (2023)
Author(s)

Xiaoyu Zhang (University of California)

Jianping Li (University of California)

Po Wei Chi (None)

Senthil Chandrasegaran (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Kwan Liu Ma (University of California)

Research Group
DesIgning Value in Ecosystems
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581260 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
DesIgning Value in Ecosystems
Article number
204
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-4503-9421-5
Event
2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2023-04-23 - 2023-04-28), Congress Center Hamburg (CCH), Hamburg, Germany
Downloads counter
289
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

With the most advanced natural language processing and artificial intelligence approaches, effective summarization of long and multi-topic documents - such as academic papers - for readers from different domains still remains a challenge. To address this, we introduce ConceptEVA, a mixed-initiative approach to generate, evaluate, and customize summaries for long and multi-topic documents. ConceptEVA incorporates a custom multi-task longformer encoder decoder to summarize longer documents. Interactive visualizations of document concepts as a network reflecting both semantic relatedness and co-occurrence help users focus on concepts of interest. The user can select these concepts and automatically update the summary to emphasize them. We present two iterations of ConceptEVA evaluated through an expert review and a within-subjects study. We find that participants' satisfaction with customized summaries through ConceptEVA is higher than their own manually-generated summary, while incorporating critique into the summaries proved challenging. Based on our findings, we make recommendations for designing summarization systems incorporating mixed-initiative interactions.