Pulse shaping for ultra-fast adiabatic quantum gates

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

İlker Polat (TU Delft - QCD/Sebastiano Lab, TU Delft - QuTech Advanced Research Centre)

Ramon W.J. Overwater (TU Delft - QCD/Sebastiano Lab, TU Delft - QuTech Advanced Research Centre)

Maximilian Rimbach-Russ (Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - QuTech Advanced Research Centre, TU Delft - QCD/Rimbach-Russ)

Fabio Sebastiano (TU Delft - QuTech Advanced Research Centre, TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Research Group
QCD/Rimbach-Russ
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-026-01245-8 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
QCD/Rimbach-Russ
Journal title
NPJ Quantum Information
Issue number
1
Volume number
12
Article number
130
Page Views
25
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

A fundamental challenge in quantum computing is to increase the number of operations within the qubit coherence time. While this can be achieved by decreasing the gate duration, the use of shorter signals increases their bandwidth and can cause leakage into energetically separated states. A common method to suppress leakage for short pulses is the Derivative Removal by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) method, which, however, relies on IQ modulation of radio-frequency (RF) signals, thus cannot be applied to the baseband signals, e.g., for semiconductor spin qubits. This paper proposes a novel technique, Delayed Leakage Reduction (DLR), that suppresses leakage at targeted frequencies even for baseband control by using time-delayed repetitions of the control signal to enable rapid, high-fidelity operations. We apply DLR on the adiabatic CZ gate between two spin qubits and achieve fidelities exceeding 99.9% within 9.4 ns for a resonance frequency difference of only 100 MHz. Towards the experimental realization of the proposed control method, we also assess the impact on the fidelity of the sampling rate, noise, and signal quantization of the electronic hardware generating the control pulse, thus setting the minimum hardware requirements for any experimental demonstration.