Sequence optimisation for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting
D.G.J. Heesterbeek (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)
Frans Vos – Mentor (TU Delft - ImPhys/Computational Imaging)
Martin B.van Van Gijzen – Mentor (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)
Sebastian Weingärtner – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - ImPhys/Computational Imaging)
E. Verschuur – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - ImPhys/Computational Imaging)
Y. van Gennip – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Mathematical Physics)
Martijn A. Nagtegaal – Mentor (TU Delft - ImPhys/Computational Imaging)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) is a relatively new approach for simultaneously estimating multiple quantitative maps in one acquisition. Sequence optimisation for MRF can be a powerful tool in increasing the accuracy an precision of the quantitative results. Multi-component analysis in the MRF framework can distinguish multiple different tissues in one voxel such as myelin water and white matter which play an important role in monitoring progressive diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Using the estimation theoretic Cramér-Rao bound, optimisations of the acquisition sequences can be performed, that increase the precision of the resulting tissue maps. The effect of this optimisation has been confirmed using numerical simulations. Speed-ups in MRF are generated using significant undersampling of the k-space information. This results in spatially coherent undersampling artefacts, that generally is the dominating error source for regular $T_1$ and $T_2$ mapping. The undersampling artefacts can be predicted using a mathematical model leveraging on techniques from perturbation theory. Numerical simulations suggested that optimisations of the acquisition parameters are effective in reducing the undersampling error. This was confirmed using in vivo scans. The optimisations resulting from these two different models are easily implemented in future clinical practice.