A Reference Architecture for Blockchain-Based Crowdsourcing Platforms

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Y. Gong (Wuhan University)

Sélinde Engelenburg (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Marijn Marijn (TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology)

Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Copyright
© 2021 Y. Gong, S.H. van Engelenburg, M.F.W.H.A. Janssen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040053
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Y. Gong, S.H. van Engelenburg, M.F.W.H.A. Janssen
Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Issue number
4
Volume number
16
Pages (from-to)
937-958
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Companies increasingly tender knowledge-intensive tasks using crowdsourcing platforms to gain access to scarce knowledge and skills otherwise out of reach, and in this way, gaining competitive advantage. Despite its potential, existing crowdsourcing platforms encounter several challenges, including (1) fragmentation of expertise, as there are many platforms, (2) distrust between task providers and crowdsourcing participants, as identity and past performance are often not known, and (3) inability to learn from experience due to a lack of openness. A reference architecture for blockchain-based knowledge-intensive crowdsourcing platforms to mediate transactions between demand and supply of knowledge is designed in this paper to overcome these challenges. A design science research method is followed to develop the architecture. The reference architecture shows how blockchain and smart contract components can be integrated to support and coordinate knowledge-intensive crowdsourcing activities. By removing traditional e-commerce intermediaries, blockchain reduces search friction, knowledge transfer costs, and cheating by task providers or crowdsourcing participants.