Simplifying models and estimating grasp performance for comparing dynamic hand orthosis concepts

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Ronald Bos (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Dick Plettenburg (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Just Herder (TU Delft - Mechatronic Systems Design, TU Delft - Precision and Microsystems Engineering)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2019 R.A. Bos, D.H. Plettenburg, J.L. Herder
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220147
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 R.A. Bos, D.H. Plettenburg, J.L. Herder
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Issue number
7
Volume number
14
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

While designing a dynamic hand orthosis to assist during activities of daily living, the designer has to know whether a concept will have sufficient grasp performance to support these activities. This is often estimated by measuring the interaction force at the contact interface. However, this requires a prototyping step and limits the practicality of comparing several concepts in an early design stage. Alternatively, this study presents and compares basic static and dynamic models to numerically estimate grasp performance. This was applied on an exemplary concept for a hydraulically operated hand orthosis grasping a circular object. The models were validated with an experimental set-up that does not require sensors at the contact interface. Static and dynamic model results were almost identical, where the static model could be around 10 times faster and is generally more robust to a high contact stiffness. Both models were unable to make accurate quantitative predictions, which is believed to be due to differences in used contact stiffness. However, the models were able to make correct qualitative comparisons, making it a valid method to compare and choose concepts in an early design stage.