Language Models and Design Theory for Efficient Engineering Knowledge Retrieval

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Tomas Mikael Elmgren (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

Axel Götling (Nordisk Elkraftteknik AB)

Adam Tiger (Nordisk Elkraftteknik AB)

Marvin Carl May (Nanyang Technological University)

Haluk Akay (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Research Group
Computational Design and Mechanics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2026.05.266 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Computational Design and Mechanics
Journal title
Procedia CIRP
Volume number
142
Pages (from-to)
310-315
Event
36th CIRP Design Conference, CIRP Design 2026 (2026-03-16 - 2026-03-18), Tokyo, Japan
Downloads counter
8
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized as a tool for connecting engineers to design knowledge because of the scale and speed with which they automate information retrieval tasks during early-stage design. However, if engineering documentation is input to LLMs without preserving design-specific structures of information, this risks unexplainable and inefficient knowledge retrieval. In this work, we incorporate design theory into the process by which design knowledge is represented for storage and retrieval by LLMs. We construct design-inspired data representations of engineering knowledge with the aim of improving their explainability and performance. We demonstrate these methods on an industry case study of the design of high voltage power transmission structures. We present an implementation integrating LLMs into a design theory-based framework for knowledge representation. We validate the system experimentally with human subject matter experts and conduct a time complexity analysis of the search efficiency of the design theory-based representations in comparison to baseline methods. We conclude that design theory-based representations result in improved computational search efficiency, but that establishing ground truth in engineering design for validation purposes is challenging.