Sustainability of bio-based polyethylene

The influence of biomass sourcing and end-of-life

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

L. Ritzen (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

B. Sprecher (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

C. A. Bakker (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

Ruud Balkenende (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

Research Group
Design for Sustainability
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13555
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Design for Sustainability
Issue number
6
Volume number
28
Pages (from-to)
1684-1698
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Bio-based polymers may present a sustainable, circular way to reduce the environmental impact of plastics because they are produced from biomass that absorbs CO2 during its growth. However, sourcing (type of biomass used and cultivation location), production, and end-of-life affect the environmental impact of bio-based plastics. We assessed the effect of sourcing and end-of-life options on the environmental impact of bio-based high-density polyethylene (bio-HDPE) in 31 sourcing scenarios and five end-of-life options. Our study found that careful consideration of biomass sourcing (biomass type and production location) and end-of-life is needed to optimize the environmental impact of bio-based plastics. If these aspects are not considered, the environmental impact of bio-HDPE may exceed that of its petrochemical-based counterpart. The direct availability of fermentable sugars indicated a lower environmental impact. The production location affected the resources needed for biomass cultivation and the environmental impact of processing due to the energy mix. Recently published guidelines do not allow biogenic carbon to be accounted for during the production stage, but only upon the incineration of the plastic. Our results show that this way of attributing biogenic carbon results in an apparent disadvantage for bio-based plastics compared to petrochemical-based plastics. Furthermore, it disadvantaged mechanical recycling of bio-based plastics compared to incineration, a result out of line with circular economy principles.