Green Bond Valuation: A Numerical Mathematics Perspective

Assessing the Influence of Environmental Factors

Master Thesis (2024)
Author(s)

J.O.M. Rutten (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

Kees Vuik – Mentor (TU Delft - Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics)

V.N.S.R. Dwarka – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Copyright
© 2024 Jurriaan Rutten
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Copyright
© 2024 Jurriaan Rutten
Graduation Date
14-02-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Applied Mathematics | Financial Engineering']
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This thesis presents a novel approach to the pricing of green bonds, a growing segment in financial markets with an emphasis on environmental sustainability. Unlike traditional financial instruments, green bonds uniquely incorporate environmental considerations, particularly carbon price (c_t), along with traditional factors like the short rate (r_t), into their valuation. This integration is increasingly relevant in today’s economy, reflecting a shift towards sustainable finance. The core of this research involves applying advanced numerical methods, including the Finite Difference Method, Crank-Nicolson discretization, GMRES and Bi-CGSTAB, in order to develop and analyze pricing models for both green and conventional bonds. The study aims to assess how environmental factors impact the efficiency of these numerical techniques and to compare the outcomes with conventional bond models. The research reveals that green bonds, compared to conventional bonds, present unique numerical challenges, notably requiring more iterations for convergence in iterative methods GMRES and Bi-CGSTAB because of the high carbon price volatility (σc) and the ’Greenium’ phenomenon. Moreover, the comparative analysis showed that while Bi-CGSTAB outperforms GMRES in the green bond model, the opposite is true for conventional bonds. This study not only contributes to the theoretical understanding of green bond pricing but also offers practical insights for financial analysts and investors navigating this evolving market.

Keywords: Green Bonds, Bond Pricing, Zero-Coupon Bond, Short Rate Modeling, Numerical Methods, Crank-Nicolson, GMRES, BiCGSTAB, Environmental Finance, Sustainable Investing, Comparative Analysis, Financial Modeling.

Files

License info not available