On the Consistent Classification and Treatment of Uncertainties in Structural Health Monitoring Applications

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Antonios Kamariotis (ETH Zürich)

Konstantinos Vlachas (ETH Zürich)

Vasileios Ntertimanis (ETH Zürich)

Ioannis Koune (TU Delft - Geo-engineering)

Alice Cicirello (University of Cambridge)

Eleni Chatzi (ETH Zürich)

Geo-engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067140
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Geo-engineering
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public. @en
Issue number
1
Volume number
11
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a comprehensive definition and classification of various sources of uncertainty within the fields of structural dynamics, system identification, and structural health monitoring (SHM), with a primary focus on the latter. Utilizing the classical input-output system representation as a main contextual framework, we present a taxonomy of uncertainties, intended for consistent classification of uncertainties in SHM applications: (i) input uncertainty; (ii) model form uncertainty; (iii) model parameter/variable uncertainty; (iv) measurement uncertainty; and (v) inherent variability. We then critically review methods and algorithms that address these uncertainties in the context of key SHM tasks: system identification and model inference, model updating, accounting for environmental and operational variability (EOV), virtual sensing, damage identification, and prognostic health management. A benchmark shear frame model with hysteretic links is employed as a running example to illustrate the application of selected methods and algorithmic tools. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future research directions in uncertainty quantification for SHM.

Files

Risk_011_01_011108.pdf
(pdf | 4.17 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 09-06-2025
License info not available