Opportunistic experiments to constrain aerosol effective radiative forcing
Matthew W. Christensen (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, University of Oxford)
Andrew Gettelman (University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
Jan Cermak (Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie)
Guy Dagan (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
Michael Diamond (University of Washington, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, University of Colorado - Boulder)
Alyson Douglas (University of Oxford)
Graham Feingold (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)
Franziska Glassmeier (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
Tom Goren (University of Leipzig)
Daniel P. Grosvenor (University of Leeds)
undefined More Authors (External organisation)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Aerosol-cloud interactions (ACIs) are considered to be the most uncertain driver of present-day radiative forcing due to human activities. The nonlinearity of cloud-state changes to aerosol perturbations make it challenging to attribute causality in observed relationships of aerosol radiative forcing. Using correlations to infer causality can be challenging when meteorological variability also drives both aerosol and cloud changes independently. Natural and anthropogenic aerosol perturbations from well-defined sources provide "opportunistic experiments"(also known as natural experiments) to investigate ACI in cases where causality may be more confidently inferred. These perturbations cover a wide range of locations and spatiotemporal scales, including point sources such as volcanic eruptions or industrial sources, plumes from biomass burning or forest fires, and tracks from individual ships or shipping corridors. We review the different experimental conditions and conduct a synthesis of the available satellite datasets and field campaigns to place these opportunistic experiments on a common footing, facilitating new insights and a clearer understanding of key uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing. Cloud albedo perturbations are strongly sensitive to background meteorological conditions. Strong liquid water path increases due to aerosol perturbations are largely ruled out by averaging across experiments. Opportunistic experiments have significantly improved process-level understanding of ACI, but it remains unclear how reliably the relationships found can be scaled to the global level, thus demonstrating a need for deeper investigation in order to improve assessments of aerosol radiative forcing and climate change.
help_outline