Identifying Human Preview Control Behavior Using Subsystem Identification

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Pieter Bas J.C. Bentinck (Student TU Delft)

Daan M. Pool (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Kasper Van Der El (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Jesse B. Hoagg (University of Kentucky)

M Mulder (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
Copyright
© 2022 Pieter Bas J.C. Bentinck, D.M. Pool, Kasper van der El, Jesse B. Hoagg, Max Mulder
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.251
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Pieter Bas J.C. Bentinck, D.M. Pool, Kasper van der El, Jesse B. Hoagg, Max Mulder
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Issue number
29
Volume number
55
Pages (from-to)
172-177
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Better understanding of manual control requires more research on human anticipatory feedforward behaviour. Recent advances include a human control model for preview tracking, and a subsystem identification (SSID) technique that uses a candidate pool approach to identify the human feedforward and feedback responses. This paper discusses the performance of the SSID method when estimating the preview control model parameters. Through simulations of a preview task with two controlled element dynamics, the SSID performance with different remnant noise levels and candidate pool densities is quantified. We demonstrate its successful application to the preview model and show that its performance deteriorates for higher noise levels. While the feedforward parameters are estimated accurately, the high-frequency compensatory feedback dynamics cannot be reliably determined. Future work focuses on alternative formulations for using SSID to estimate preview model parameters. Since in manual control the closed-loop magnitude decreases at higher frequencies, effects of manipulating the weightings of the closed-loop fitting cost values at these frequencies must be further analyzed.