Strain-rate based arclength model for nonlinear microscale analysis of unidirectional composites under off-axis loading

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

D. Kovacevic (TU Delft - Applied Mechanics, Dutch Polymer Institute)

Frans P. Van Der Meer (TU Delft - Applied Mechanics)

Research Group
Applied Mechanics
Copyright
© 2022 D. Kovacevic, F.P. van der Meer
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111697
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 D. Kovacevic, F.P. van der Meer
Research Group
Applied Mechanics
Volume number
250
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this paper, a micromechanical framework for modeling the rate-dependent response of unidirectional composites subjected to off-axis loading is introduced. The model is intended for a thin slice representative volume element that is oriented perpendicular to the reinforcement of the composite material. The testing conditions from a uniaxial off-axis test are achieved by a dedicated strain-rate based arclength formulation. The constraint equation of the arclength model is constructed such that the deformation state of the micromodel, as imposed in its local coordinate system, corresponds to the strain-rate applied on the material in global frame of reference. The kinematic description allows for finite strains in the material, meaning that the micromodel changes orientation during the deformation process. This geometric nonlinear effect is also included in the evaluation of external loading, ensuring that the external forces are equivalent to the applied off-axis stress in global coordinate system. Several examples are considered in order to show that the model resolves rate-dependency of the material, accounts for different off-axis loading, and captures finite strains exactly. Additionally, a small strain version of the model is derived from the general nonlinear framework. Results obtained with this simplified approach are compared to results of the large deformation framework.