System analysis and controller design for the electric pump of a deep-throttling rocket engine

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Runsheng Hu (National University of Defense Technology)

Riccardo Ferrari (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

Zhenyu Chen (North China Electric Power University)

Yuqiang Cheng (National University of Defense Technology)

Xiaobin Zhu (National University of Defense Technology)

Xing Cui (National University of Defense Technology)

Jianjun Wu (National University of Defense Technology)

Research Group
Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Copyright
© 2021 R. Hu, Riccardo M.G. Ferrari, Z. Chen, Yuqiang Cheng, Xiaobin Zhu, Xing Cui, Jianjun Wu
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106729
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 R. Hu, Riccardo M.G. Ferrari, Z. Chen, Yuqiang Cheng, Xiaobin Zhu, Xing Cui, Jianjun Wu
Research Group
Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Volume number
114
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper proposes a controller design for the electric pump of a deep-throttling rocket engine. The nonlinearity of the system is taken into consideration by analyzing the gap metric. Then, proportional-integral-derivative controller and gain-scheduling linear quadratic regulator are designed. Analyzing the amplitude- and phase-frequency characteristics as well as the pole-zero distribution of the system, the results show that the designed controllers can stabilize the linearized equations in incremental form at different operating points. This indicates that these two controllers are available for the original system in the whole range of working conditions and this is verified in the simulation. Meanwhile, the comparison between proportional-integral-derivative controller and gain-scheduling linear quadratic regulator is presented. It demonstrates that the proportional-integral-derivative controller is better at tracking both step and ramp signals but with worse control signals. It means that the proportional-integral-derivative controller seems less suitable for real use due to severe oscillations. Meanwhile, the parameter tuning of a proportional-integral-derivative controller depends on more extensive manual tuning. Therefore, the gain-scheduling linear quadratic regulator is preferred. 

Files

1_s2.0_S127096382100239X_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 2.29 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 13-10-2021
License info not available