Design for Behaviour Change as a Driver for Sustainable Innovation

Challenges and Opportunities for Implementation in the Private and Public Sectors

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

K. Niedderer (University of Wolverhampton)

G Ludden (University of Twente)

S.J. Clune (University of Lancaster)

D. Lockton (Royal College of Art)

J. Mackrill (Imperial College London)

A. Morris (Loughborough University)

R. Cain (University of Warwick)

E. Gardiner (University of Warwick)

M. Evans (Manchester Metropolitan University)

R. Gutteridge (University of Wolverhampton)

Paul Hekkert (TU Delft - Form and Experience)

Research Group
Form and Experience
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Research Group
Form and Experience
Issue number
2
Volume number
10
Pages (from-to)
67-85
Downloads counter
379
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Over the last decade, design for behaviour change has become increasingly recognised as a strategy for enabling social change. Despite
this, we are far from understanding its implementation, especially through the private and public sectors. This study has surveyed private
and public sector stakeholders with regard to their current knowledge of, and approach to, design for behaviour change. The aim was
to identify the challenges for professional stakeholders in understanding, accessing and implementing design for behaviour change.
Underpinned by a literature review of design for behaviour change theories and approaches, an online survey and two focus groups with private and public sector stakeholders were conducted with particular focus on small and medium size enterprises (SMEs). The results identified that there is a significant disconnect between available theoretical knowledge of design for behaviour change and its practical implementation. Reasons for this include a lack of awareness and common language, of evidence based examples, and of evaluation methods and inter-sector collaborations. In response, a set of recommendations has been developed to propose ways forward for the wider
understanding and application of design for behaviour change.