Surgical instrument counting
Current practice and staff perspectives on technological support
A. M. Kooijmans (Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
L. de Rouw (Student TU Delft)
Maarten Van der Elst (Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
John J. van den Dobbelsteen (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Background: Surgical instrument counting is a manual, attention-intensive task of the operating room (OR) nurse. Many labour-saving technologies have been proposed, but implementation remains challenging. Knowledge of current counting methods and staff preferences could guide future developments towards effective application. Approach: We observed OR nurses counting materials and instruments in 50 surgical procedures performed by various surgical specialties in a regional teaching hospital in Delft, The Netherlands. Additionally, we surveyed them on their preferences concerning the methods of counting. Key findings: Variations in approaches of surgical counting were observed, with OR nurses using multiple strategies and counting techniques to manage disruptions and limit workload. Interest in using supportive technology is limited to the preoperative and postoperative phase. Relevance: This research relates observational data to staff preferences. Our findings may guide future developments of labour-saving innovations regarding surgical counting towards developing more effective applications and to ensure successful implementation.
help_outline