Marginalized Spatialities

Situated reflections on state collectivism and kincommoning in Albania

Doctoral Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

Dorina Pllumbi (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

K.M. Havik – Promotor (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Tom Avermaete – Copromotor (ETH Zürich)

Research Group
Situated Architecture
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.71690/abe.2026.13 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Defense Date
29-06-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Research Group
Situated Architecture
Publisher
A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment
ISBN (print)
978-94-6518-364-0
Downloads counter
26
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This doctoral study explores forms of collectivities and their spatial politics in Albania across three political periods: state socialism, the anarchic aftermath of its collapse in the early 1990s, and the current neoliberal regime. It challenges the prevailing assumption that the fall of state socialism led to the loss of collective practices and a turn towards individualism. The study draws a sharp distinction between state collectivism, utilized by the party-state as the main ideological tool, and fragmented commoning practices that persisted and intensified precisely in moments of institutional failure and political instability.

Empirically, despite their fluctuating agency, it shows that commoning practices have remained present and politically relevant throughout successive regimes. Often overlooked and marginalized in professional and academic discourse, they have served as vital social infrastructures shaping the materialization of livelihood patterns and urbanization. Theoretically, the study advances the concept of kincommoning to account for collective practices reliant on practical kin-making, spatial proximity, reciprocity, and migration. It engages with these practices as contested terrains, recognizing the internal tensions and contradictions, while foregrounding their capacity to sustain collective life, as well as their often unseen defiant tacit politics of everyday life. Methodologically, the research has a transdisciplinary approach, integrating multi-modal spatial ethnography, including documentary film production, and reflexive writing.

Centering the agency of marginalized places as generative of knowledge rather than mere case studies, the dissertation critiques deterministic emancipatory frameworks perpetuated by the interplay of hierarchies of state power, market forces, and professional practices of architecture and urban planning.