Quantifying Sustainability of Coastal Engineering Solutions

Development of an Assessment Framework to Quantify Sustainable Aspects of Coastal Engineering Solutions

Master Thesis (2024)
Author(s)

M.A.M. Al-Qadi (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Contributor(s)

Jose A.A. Antolinez – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Coastal Engineering)

E Mostert – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Jeroen van den Bos – Graduation committee member (Royal Boskalis Westminster)

Irena Doets – Graduation committee member (Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V.)

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Graduation Date
11-06-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Civil Engineering | Hydraulic Engineering | Coastal Engineering', 'Civil Engineering | Environmental Engineering']
Sponsors
Royal Boskalis Westminster
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This thesis reviewed current methods for monetarily quantifying the sustainable aspects of coastal engineering solutions. It developed a holistic monetary valuation framework that integrates the Ecosystem Services Assessment (ESA) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the impacts and benefits of coastal engineering interventions. The framework offers a comprehensive approach to assessing the economic, social, and environmental impacts and benefits of coastal solutions, thereby enabling informed decision-making.

Applying the framework to a case study in the Netherlands demonstrated its effectiveness in providing valuable insights into the sustainability of coastal protection measures. The sensitivity analysis underscored the importance of accurately valuing ecosystem services and environmental impacts, as well as the influence of economic parameters, materials, and modes of operation on project viability. Additionally, the framework’s potential for broader application was illustrated through a feasibility study in Suriname.

The study’s findings highlight the need for improved data collection, stakeholder engagement, methodological refinements, and consideration of policy environments to enhance the framework’s applicability and effectiveness. Future research should address these areas to further improve the informed decision-making process regarding the sustainability of coastal engineering alternatives.

Files

License info not available