Social Media as a tool to contribute to evaluation practices by the Dutch justice system concerning recidivism

Master Thesis (2019)
Author(s)

G. Anlagan (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Contributor(s)

H. Bouwman – Mentor (TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology)

L Rook – Mentor (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation)

Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
Copyright
© 2019 Gökhan Anlagan
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Gökhan Anlagan
Graduation Date
23-09-2019
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Management of Technology (MoT)']
Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The Dutch justice department could benefit greatly from the personal digital data from social media since psychological attributes are known to be strong predictors for recidivism, and assessing the risk of recidivism (with the RISc) in the Netherlands is a very cost- and labour intensive process with low prediction power. The research question "How can personal digital data extracted from social media, as an alternative for existing ways to measure personality attributes, efficiently and accurately contribute to determination of the recidivism probability of an individual?" is raised to give the Dutch justice department recommendations on how the assessment of the risk of recidivism can be improved based on the predictability of psychological characteristics from social media data. We performed a meta-analysis to explore (1) the strength of the predictability of social media data of the Big Five personality traits, and (2) how potential moderators influence the accuracy of the prediction. Main findings were the point estimates of the random effects model (Agreeableness 0.26; Extraversion 0.36; Conscientiousness 0.27; Openness 0.30; Neuroticism 0.31 all with ) and the highest significant values from the moderator analysis for Agreeableness , Extraversion , Openness , and Neuroticism for the moderator 'Activity', and for Conscientiousness for the moderator 'Social Media Platform'. This study gives new insights which will help the Dutch justice department make the assessment of recidivism (1) relatively effortless, (2) cheaper, (3) more accurate, and (4) without cognitive bias.

Files

License info not available