Design of second order sliding mode and sliding mode algorithms

A practical insight to DC-DC buck converter

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

Seyed Mehdi Rakhtala (Golestan University)

Monazzahalsadat Yasoubi (Concordia University)

S. Hassan Hassan HosseinNia (TU Delft - Mechatronic Systems Design)

Research Group
Mechatronic Systems Design
Copyright
© 2017 Seyed Mehdi Rakhtala, Monazzahalsadat Yasoubi, S. Hassan HosseinNia
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2017.7510550
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 Seyed Mehdi Rakhtala, Monazzahalsadat Yasoubi, S. Hassan HosseinNia
Research Group
Mechatronic Systems Design
Issue number
3
Volume number
4
Pages (from-to)
483-497
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper presents a simple and systematic approach to design second order sliding mode controller for buck converters. The second order sliding mode control U+0028 SOSMC U+0029 based on twisting algorithm has been implemented to control buck switch mode converter. The idea behind this strategy is to suppress chattering and maintain robustness and finite time convergence properties of the output voltage error to the equilibrium point under the load variations and parametric uncertainties. In addition, the influence of the twisting algorithm on the performance of closed-loop system is investigated and compared with other algorithms of first order sliding mode control such as adaptive sliding mode control U+0028 ASMC U+0029, nonsingular terminal sliding mode control U+0028 NTSMC U+0029. In comparative evaluation, the transient response of the output voltage with the step change in the load and the start-up response of the output voltage with the step change in the input voltage of buck converter were compared. Experimental results were obtained from a hardware setup constructed in laboratory. Finally, for all of the surveyed control methods, the theoretical considerations, numerical simulations, and experimental measurements from a laboratory prototype are compared for different operating points. It is shown that the proposed twisting method presents an improvement in steady state error and settling time of output voltage during load changes.

Files

07974895.pdf
(pdf | 5.54 Mb)
License info not available