Adaptation of Engineering Wake Models using Gaussian Process Regression and High-Fidelity Simulation Data

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Leif Erik Andersson (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

B. M. Doekemeijer (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

D.C. Van Der Hoek (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

Jan Willem Van Wingerden (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

L. Imsland (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

Research Group
Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Copyright
© 2020 Leif Erik Andersson, B.M. Doekemeijer, D.C. van der Hoek, J.W. van Wingerden, Lars Imsland
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/2/022043
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Leif Erik Andersson, B.M. Doekemeijer, D.C. van der Hoek, J.W. van Wingerden, Lars Imsland
Research Group
Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Issue number
2
Volume number
1618
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This article investigates the optimization of yaw control inputs of a nine-turbine wind farm. The wind farm is simulated using the high-fidelity simulator SOWFA. The optimization is performed with a modifier adaptation scheme based on Gaussian processes. Modifier adaptation corrects for the mismatch between plant and model and helps to converge to the actual plan optimum. In the case study the modifier adaptation approach is compared with the Bayesian optimization approach. Moreover, the use of two different covariance functions in the Gaussian process regression is discussed. Practical recommendations concerning the data preparation and application of the approach are given. It is shown that both the modifier adaptation and the Bayesian optimization approach can improve the power production with overall smaller yaw misalignments in comparison to the Gaussian wake model.