Why do stakeholders (not) participate in co-creation for energy access? A behavioural analysis of the Netherlands Energy Compact

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Amalia Suryani (University of Twente)

Nihit Goyal (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Niek Moonen (University of Twente)

Jelena Popović (University of Twente)

Research Group
Organisation & Governance
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104936 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Journal title
Energy Research and Social Science
Volume number
140
Article number
104936
Downloads counter
5
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Multi-stakeholder collaboration platforms are widely promoted as a way to accelerate progress on global challenges such as ensuring universal access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy. Yet little is known about why individual stakeholders choose to participate (or not) in these arrangements, and what determines the depth of their engagement. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 21 professionals associated with the Netherlands Energy Compact, this study applies the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) framework to explain variation in participation. We identify three levels of involvement: low (attending events), medium (contributing to working groups) and high (shaping collective decisions). Most participation occurs at the lowest level. While stakeholders possess strong personal capabilities and motivation, deeper engagement is constrained by external barriers, particularly limited access to finance and declining funding opportunities. The findings further suggest that the COM-B framework requires adaptation for multi-stakeholder settings, as single factors such as funding may simultaneously influence capability, opportunity and motivation. By adapting the COM-B framework to the context of multi-stakeholder co-creation, this study provides a behavioural lens for understanding differences in participation intensity. For practitioners, the results highlight actionable priorities, including strengthening financing mechanisms, improving cross-organisational coordination, and designing more effective collaborative processes to enable stakeholders to move from passive participation to active co-creation in initiatives addressing sustainable development goals.